1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1978 Renault 20
To start off, 1978 Renault 20 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,647 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Renault 20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Renault 20 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 1978 Renault 20 | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 40 | 20 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1647 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2670 mm |
