1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 BMW 320
To start off, 1982 BMW 320 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1982 BMW 320 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 40 | 320 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2580 mm |