1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 BMW 328
To start off, 1982 BMW 328 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 BMW 328 weights approximately 516 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 BMW 328 (210 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (83 Nm). This means 1982 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 1982 BMW 328 | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | A 40 | 328 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1506 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2840 mm |
