1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Renault 11
To start off, 1982 Renault 11 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Renault 11 (47 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Renault 11 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1982 Renault 11.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1982 Renault 11 | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | 11 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1106 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 9.2:1 |
Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 138 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2490 mm |