1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1983 Talbot Samba
To start off, 1983 Talbot Samba is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Talbot Samba (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Talbot Samba should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 232 kg more than 1983 Talbot Samba.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A 40 (80 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Talbot Samba. (64 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Talbot Samba.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1983 Talbot Samba | |
Make | Austin | Talbot |
Model | A 40 | Samba |
Year Released | 1952 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 64 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 62 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2350 mm |