1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1986 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 1986 Fiat Argenta is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,583 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Argenta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Argenta (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Argenta should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Fiat Argenta (131 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (80 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1986 Fiat Argenta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 1986 Fiat Argenta | |
| Make | Austin | Fiat |
| Model | A 40 | Argenta |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1583 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 35 L |
