1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1987 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1987 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Mitsubishi Lancer (74 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Mitsubishi Lancer (114 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1987 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 1987 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A 40 | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1468 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 79 Nm | 114 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2390 mm |
