1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1988 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1988 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1988 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 950 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1988 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 40 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1952 | 1988 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3090 mm |