1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1989 Dodge Lancer
To start off, 1989 Dodge Lancer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Dodge Lancer (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Dodge Lancer weights approximately 200 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1989 Dodge Lancer | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 40 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2630 mm |