1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1989 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1989 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1989 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 40 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4690 mm |