1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1992 Buick Century
To start off, 1992 Buick Century is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Buick Century (109 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Buick Century (183 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (80 Nm). This means 1992 Buick Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1992 Buick Century | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 40 | Century |
Year Released | 1952 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 109 HP |
Torque | 80 Nm | 183 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1364 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2662 mm |