1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1998 Honda Integra
To start off, 1998 Honda Integra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Honda Integra (143 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Honda Integra weights approximately 199 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1998 Honda Integra | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 40 | Integra |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2570 mm |