1952 Austin A 40 vs. 1999 BMW V12
To start off, 1999 BMW V12 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW V12 (550 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 512 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 BMW V12 weights approximately 658 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 829 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (80 Nm). This means 1999 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 1999 BMW V12 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 40 | V12 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 5990 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 550 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 909 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2890 mm |