1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2000 GMC Safari is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 152 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 984 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (80 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2000 GMC Safari | |
Make | Austin | GMC |
Model | A 40 | Safari |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 80 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2830 mm |