1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2000 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2000 Westfield ZEI is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Westfield ZEI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Westfield ZEI (129 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 252 kg more than 2000 Westfield ZEI.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Westfield ZEI (162 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (80 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2000 Westfield ZEI will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2000 Westfield ZEI | |
Make | Austin | Westfield |
Model | A 40 | ZEI |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2340 mm |