1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW

To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 915 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (83 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications: