1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2002 Mahindra Bolero

To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mahindra Bolero (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 792 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mahindra Bolero (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (83 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Mahindra Bolero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications: