1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 290 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2003 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 40 | Minica |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2350 mm |