1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2003 Volkswagen Sharan

To start off, 2003 Volkswagen Sharan is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Volkswagen Sharan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volkswagen Sharan (148 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Sharan should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volkswagen Sharan weights approximately 674 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volkswagen Sharan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volkswagen Sharan (210 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Volkswagen Sharan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 40 2003 Volkswagen Sharan
Make Austin Volkswagen
Model A 40 Sharan
Year Released 1952 2003
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1199 cc 1786 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 41 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 79 Nm 210 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65.5 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 89 mm 86.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 7.2:1 9.3:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1000 kg 1674 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4630 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2850 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]