1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 726 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado (305 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (83 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2004 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 3458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 74 L |