1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,818 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 498 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (386 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (80 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | Express |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 4818 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 386 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 83 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 117 L |