1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2004 Nissan Frontier is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (180 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 786 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (274 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 40 | Frontier |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3278 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 79 Nm | 274 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 8.9:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1786 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3340 mm |
