1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Colorado

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (173 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (83 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 40 2006 Chevrolet Colorado
Make Austin Chevrolet
Model A 40 Colorado
Year Released 1952 2006
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1200 cc 2770 cc
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 49 HP 173 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 83 Nm 251 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65.5 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 89 mm 101.6 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 5270 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 74 L