1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 40 | Raider |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3340 mm |