1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2007 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2007 Ford Ecosport is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2007 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 40 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2490 mm |