1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2007 Kia Rondo
To start off, 2007 Kia Rondo is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,656 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Kia Rondo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Kia Rondo (182 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Kia Rondo should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Kia Rondo (247 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2007 Kia Rondo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2007 Kia Rondo | |
Make | Austin | Kia |
Model | A 40 | Rondo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 247 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 86.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 10.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2710 mm |