1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2008 SsangYong Kyron
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Kyron is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 SsangYong Kyron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 SsangYong Kyron weights approximately 893 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 2008 SsangYong Kyron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Kyron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 SsangYong Kyron (310 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 SsangYong Kyron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 2008 SsangYong Kyron | |
| Make | Austin | SsangYong |
| Model | A 40 | Kyron |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 79 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 86.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 85.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1893 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2750 mm |
