1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2009 Ford F-250

To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 24 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-250 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 412 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (83 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 40 2009 Ford F-250
Make Austin Ford
Model A 40 F-250
Year Released 1952 2009
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1200 cc 5400 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 49 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 83 Nm 495 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 3 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 990 kg 966 kg
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 5770 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 2040 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1930 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 3490 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 144 L