1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2009 Hummer H3
To start off, 2009 Hummer H3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Hummer H3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hummer H3 (363 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 322 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 2009 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2009 Hummer H3 | |
Make | Austin | Hummer |
Model | A 40 | H3 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 363 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2000 mm |