1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2009 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2009 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Proton Gen-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Proton Gen-2 (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Proton Gen-2 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Proton Gen-2 (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Proton Gen-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2009 Proton Gen-2 | |
Make | Austin | Proton |
Model | A 40 | Gen-2 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2610 mm |