1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan

To start off, 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.

Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 40 2010 Dodge Grand Caravan
Make Austin Dodge
Model A 40 Grand Caravan
Year Released 1952 2010
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1199 cc 3800 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 41 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 79 Nm 311 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 5144 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 1953 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1814 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 3078 mm