1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. Both 1952 Austin A 40 and 2012 Audi A3 are equipped with a 1,200 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (104 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2012 Audi A3 | |
Make | Austin | Audi |
Model | A 40 | A3 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |