1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (230 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 40 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | Captiva |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 79 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2707 mm |