1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV weights approximately 170 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A 40 | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2550 mm |
