1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Renault Thalia
To start off, 2012 Renault Thalia is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Thalia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Thalia (64 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Thalia should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Thalia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Thalia (160 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 40. (79 Nm). This means 2012 Renault Thalia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 2012 Renault Thalia | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 40 | Thalia |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 79 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2473 mm |
