1952 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Volkswagen up
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen up is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 71 kg more than 2012 Volkswagen up.
Because 1952 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen up, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 40 | 2012 Volkswagen up | |
| Make | Austin | Volkswagen |
| Model | A 40 | up |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 75 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 929 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2420 mm |
