1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1941 Buick 40
To start off, 1952 Austin A 70 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Buick 40 (114 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Buick 40 weights approximately 310 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 70 | 1941 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Austin | Buick |
| Model | A 70 | 40 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 4066 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1590 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3000 mm |
