1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 1960 DKW Munga is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 70 (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 70 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 1960 DKW Munga | |
Make | Austin | DKW |
Model | A 70 | Munga |
Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 7.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 31 L |