1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1963 Renault 8
To start off, 1963 Renault 8 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 70 (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1963 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 70 should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1963 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 1963 Renault 8 | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 70 | 8 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 38 L |