1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1963 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 70 (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 70 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A 70 (157 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1952 Austin A 70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 70 | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Austin | Suzuki |
| Model | A 70 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2060 mm |
