1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1974 Holden Torana
To start off, 1974 Holden Torana is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Holden Torana (101 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Holden Torana should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1974 Holden Torana.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A 70 (157 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Holden Torana. (156 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1952 Austin A 70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 1974 Holden Torana | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | A 70 | Torana |
Year Released | 1952 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1897 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2590 mm |