1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1979 Datsun 280
To start off, 1979 Datsun 280 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Datsun 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Datsun 280 (140 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Datsun 280 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1979 Datsun 280.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 1979 Datsun 280 | |
Make | Austin | Datsun |
Model | A 70 | 280 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |