1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 175 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 70 | 1980 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 70 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 4375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2760 mm |
