1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 285 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 70 | 1980 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 70 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 4097 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2750 mm |
