1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa
To start off, 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 3,480 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa (252 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa weights approximately 230 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 70 | 1982 Lamborghini Jalpa | |
| Make | Austin | Lamborghini |
| Model | A 70 | Jalpa |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3480 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |
