1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1983 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1983 Lincoln Continental is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lincoln Continental (129 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 330 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 1983 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Austin | Lincoln |
Model | A 70 | Continental |
Year Released | 1952 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 4940 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2760 mm |