1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1983 Seat Ronda

To start off, 1983 Seat Ronda is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Austin A 70 (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1983 Seat Ronda. (62 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Austin A 70 should accelerate faster than 1983 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1983 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Austin A 70 1983 Seat Ronda
Make Austin Seat
Model A 70 Ronda
Year Released 1952 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2200 cc 1193 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 63 HP 62 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 5800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79.4 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 111.1 mm 67.5 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1270 kg 900 kg
Vehicle Length 4150 mm 4020 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1900 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2460 mm