1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1986 Ford Aerostar is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Aerostar (99 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 140 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Austin A 70 | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 70 | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3030 mm |
