1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1990 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1990 Chrysler ES is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1990 Chrysler ES.
Because 1952 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 1990 Chrysler ES | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A 70 | ES |
Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2470 mm |