1952 Austin A 70 vs. 1994 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1994 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Mustang (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Mustang weights approximately 120 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Austin A 70 | 1994 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 70 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1952 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 96.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2580 mm |